|
|
- Up to 4,800 x 1,200 dpi color, droplets as small as 2 picoliters
- Built-in 2.5-inch LCD to view, edit, and print, even from digital cameras
- Direct printing from memory cards and PictBridge-compatible cameras
- Automatic 2-sided printing; 6 individual ink tanks
- USB interface, Direct Print Port, IrDA port; PC/Mac compatible
|
List
Price: $179.99 |
|
|
|
New, lowest price : $359.99 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Product Description |
| Canon IP6000D 4800X1200 DPI PHOTO PRINTER |
| | | |
| Accessories
|
|
|
| Photo Printer or Scanner Reviews Writed by Customer
|
|
| |
Excellent printer with chipless ink cartridge
2010-01-07
 |
This printer produces excellent results with photos. I sought this printer out because of the cheap, generic cartridges that are available for it. I print a lot of photos and this is a cheap way to accomplish the task.
The printer is easy to set up, relatively quiet and very economical to operate. Chipless printer cartridges are a non-entity nowadays. Hence the need to get an older printer that used that technology. This printer will not disappoint. No downside in my opinion. |
|
| |
|
| | |
a good little printer
2009-06-27
|
| i have used it for a long tine,i started with a 4 tank now i have a 6 tank for my photos and plain paper printing a great little printer. |
|
| |
|
| | |
Canon Pixma iP6000D
2008-09-05
|
| Unit arrived in fine shape and works. Smooth transaction and the unit was well packed. Thanks |
|
| |
|
| |
Good low-priced photo printer
2008-07-08
 |
| All Canon printers are first-rate. I got this one from an Amazon seller at a very good price. |
|
| |
|
| |
Worst printer I've ever owned
2007-09-10
 |
And I've owned many. I've had this printer for almost a year now. It was OK at first although it didn't print well on certain types of paper regardless of the settings. That was disappointing but I thought I could live with that. About 3 - 4 months into owning it, problems began. And I didn't learn about the problem because I didn't have a need to print more than one document at a time. Naturally when I really need this thing to be dependable, it isn't, like now. I don't print large quantity often but when I do, I want my printer to work and work as well as the manufacturer claims. Whenever I need to print a fairly large job (for an injet, that means about 10, right now I cannot get beyond 2 without a problem), by the time it prints the third copy, blue is green, or maybe it's pink, or I get a rainbow effect. Needless to say, I waste good paper and lots of ink. And yes, of course I check to see if all the ink cartridges are full before embarking on such jobs. So I have to do a deep cleaning after every two docs printed, and even that doesn't always work the first time. It has taken me two days now to print 25 documents.
When it does print well, however, it prints very well, but what good is it if a quality print is a crapshoot with this thing? Perhaps I got a defective printer, but who would take back a printer you've had for 3 - 4 months, without a box? It seems today, although we pay less for technology, we also receive less in quality too. |
|
| |
|
