Cheap Digital Camera, La Crosse Technology, La Crosse Technology AA Rechargeable Batteries - 4 pack, Digital Camera Reviews and Related Digital Camera Accessory
Same batteries that ship with La Crosse Technology BC-900 AlphaPower Battery Charger.
List
Price: $9.99
Digital Camera Reviews Writed by Customer
[ Total Reviews: 5 Average Rating:
]
No Good from the Beginning
2007-05-10
I bought some of these with the recharger, and one of the batteries was bad almost immediately. It would not take a charge, and I was getting "null" on the display. Soon after 2 more died.
These are the worse rechargable batteries I've ever used. Save your money
1 buck per pack would be too much.
Batteries are o.k.
2007-04-24
I am finding the batteries are doing better than most rechargeables I have bought. Seem to have a good battery life. No leaking problems. If I did, I would just return.
Batteries
2007-01-22
After charging the batteries, 1 of the 2000 mah batteries only had a capacity of 400 mah. This means the whole 4-pack is no good.
Marginal Quality
2007-01-22
I purchased 8 of the AA batteries because of the low price of 4.99 for 4.
The fine print on the battery indicates 1900 milliamps plus or minus 10 percent, so the range would be 1710 to 2090 milliamps. After many days of "refreshing" the battery in my La Crosse BC-900 charger I ended up with the following:
1634 Milli amps
1795
1701
2001
1769
1781
1754
1549
So two of the cells are below spec.
Earlier I had purchase some 2700 milliamp batteries from Sanyo, on Amazon, for about 12.99 per four. All of them were within spec.
I'm glad I didn't pay a penny more than 4.99 for four.
Leaky Batteries
2007-01-17
Of 12 batteries I purchased, 2 of them were leaking in the box. I would rate these higher except that I also purchased 20 AAAs and 12 of them were leaky. I imagine I was just lucky that only 2 of this size leaked. Take the fact that most of these batteries will be bad when you compare prices. I paid $4.99/4-pack which is a good price as long as more than half of them survive (whick may not be very likely).