|
|
|
|
| Accessories
|
|
|
Digital Camera Reviews Writed by Customer
[ Total Reviews: 202 Average Rating: 
View Others
]
|
|
| |
Upgrades are never as good
2008-10-31
 |
| Generally speaking, to get the best performance from any operating system a clean install of a full version is recommended. The best choice is to choose a full version of the product and enjoy the benefits of not being left with artifacts and leftover's of your previous operating system which can lead to instability in certain cases. I would only buy this on a limited budget. |
|
| |
|
| |
What I am using now.
2008-06-13
 |
| As much as I like Vista, and I do have Vista-64 on my media computer, I still like using XP-Pro on my work computer. It is solid as a concrete highway without fast running water under it (in other-words, it does have its vulnerabilities), but far better than any other windows product out there. |
|
| |
|
| | |
Ripped off
2007-09-30
|
The version of the software was an OEM version that was only valid when installed on a new computer direct from the manufacturer. It required a volume licensing agreement which a stand alone user would not have.
Apparently this company was trying to pull a fast one. Don't buy anything from these people. |
|
| |
|
| | |
What Can You Say, It's Microsoft
2007-01-18
|
| Review not necessary, outstanding product. If you are running Home Edition, I would recommend upgrading to XP Pro, if you can afford it. |
|
| |
|
| | |
Do not buy this -- Remote Desktop is buggy in this version
2005-07-24
|
I bought this upgrade specifically to use remote desktop -- however it does not work. There are many reports on the web re. Remote desktop black/blank screen no login dialog box.
I have used remote desktop on other machines & connections without problem but there is clearly a problem with many connections using the version in WindowsXP sp2. Microsoft has not acknowledged the problem, produced a KB article or a fix for this yet. My suggestion is to avoid this until at least XP sp3 is issued. Concensus seems to think this is due to a poorly designed/implemented remote desktop protocol -- apparently it does not handle fragmented packets.
[Some have found changing the MTU size from 1500 to 1400 using a third party tool fixes it for them. However this did not work for me.] |
|
| |
|
![Cheap Digital Cameras, Digital Camera Reviews, Microsoft Windows XP Professional Upgrade [OLD VERSION] Digital Camera and Digital Camera Review](/images/digital-camera-logo.jpg){kind=logo}
![Microsoft Windows XP Professional Upgrade [OLD VERSION]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/413KAQSJ91L._SL75_.jpg)
![Cheap Microsoft Windows XP Professional Upgrade [OLD VERSION]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/413KAQSJ91L._SL160_.jpg)
